HOw does it compare to a wicked? I am itching to get one and would like to know what i am getting into.
I don't have tons of saddle time on a P series, but a few things come to mind.
First, Ritcheys always feel shorter than the size so, for me, I miss the stretch and am always back over the saddle unless I size up. Stand-over gets compromised.
Second, Wickeds have that seated climbing thing - I think it's a function of the seat tube angle and chainstays - that makes you feel like you're doing something when you transition from seated to standing (like activating your core). The Ritchey doesn't have that, it's more fluid.
Third, all P series complete bikes were lighter than all but the most tricked out Wickeds. Not a big thing, but a thing.
Fourth, I'm tall, probably a little overweight and can't spin for sh!t, so the P-20 with WCS stuff I rode for a day was all wrong, way too flexy. You could slightly ovalise the top tube between your thumb and index finger. If I were in the market, I'd be looking at a P-23/P-22.
(but the only vintage bike I'm actually lusting after these days is a Santana Moda)
Matt